This is a very intriguing post, I was looking for this information. Just so you know I located your web site when I was browsing for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.
This is a bizarre turn of events, though I suppose when you’re dealing with a compulsive liar, “predictable” isn’t really in their vocabulary. It must be incredibly frustrating for the jury to try and parse out any semblance of truth when the goalposts keep moving like that. I was actually reading a piece on https://englandderbyshire.co.uk/ about how the legal system struggles with psychological complexities in the courtroom, and this seems like a textbook example. It really makes you wonder how a fair verdict can even be reached when the defendant’s own narrative is constantly shifting.
There are 7 comments in this article: